NANKI DEVI REVENUE v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY. REVENUE LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
WRIC/1004140/2006 · 2025-11-17
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180475 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180475 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1004140 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
3. Shri Divesh Mishra, learned Standing Counsel is present.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 17, 2025 GK Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Shanker Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sampurnanand Shukla (Irshad Ali,J.) Nanki Devi Revenue .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Through Secy. Revenue Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM KUMAR SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench