Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18045 (KAR)

DR. G. MAMATHADEVI v. SRI. LAKSHMAIAH

WP/49825/2017 · 2025-01-28

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3803 WP No. 49825 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 49825 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. DR. G. MAMATHADEVI W/O. DR. V.THYAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 2. DR. V. THYAGARAJU S/O. LATE VEERABHADRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NEAR SREERAMA TEMPLE, NEWPET, ANEKAL TOWN, ANEKAL, BENGALURU-562 106. 3. SAYAD RAHAMATHULLA S/O. S.AZMATHULLA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1, SQUIRES TERRACE, PORT MACQUARIE, NSW-2444, AUSTRALIA REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER, S. AZMATHULLA, S/O LATE SYED REHMAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.80, CONCORDE CUPPARTINE, NEELADRI ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY, 1ST PHASE, BENGALURU-560 100. 4. N. NANJAMUNISSA W/O. A. ATZAL, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.249, 22ND CROSS, 28TH MAIN, Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3803 WP No. 49825 of 2017 HSR LAYOUT, SECTOR-II, BENGALURU-560 102. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT.MANJULA R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. J.M.RAJANNA SETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. LAKSHMAIAH S/O. LATE SRI.VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 2. SMT. MUNILAKSHMAMMA D/O. LATE SRI. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 3. SRI. LAKSHMI NARAYANA S/O. LATE SRI. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 4. SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA D/O. LATE SRI. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT KORANAHALLI, ALAGURI POST, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SRI. M. NAGARAJ, S/O. SRI. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.191/A, ITI LAYOUT, HOSAPALYA ROAD, M.G. PALYA, BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 068. …RESPONDENTS (R3- SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED V/O/D 19/11/2024 NOTICE TO R21, R2, R4 HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED ON IA UNDER SECTION 151 OF C.P.C DATED: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3803 WP No. 49825 of 2017 7.10.2017 IN O.S.NO.8884/2015 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JDUGE [CCH NO.38] BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners seeking withdrawal of the writ petition stating that in view of the dismissal of MFA No.7885/2017, this writ petition does not survive for consideration. The memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All I.As. in this writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26