Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180434 (ALL)

SABNAM BANO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9885/2025 · 2025-10-30

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9885 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Ms. Neeta Singh Chandel, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/ opposite parties. 2. In view of the proposed order, the notice to opposite party No.6 is hereby dispensed with. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that she may be permitted to not press this writ petition at this stage and liberty may be given to file fresh petition. 4. Considering the aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed being not pressed at this stage with the aforesaid liberty October 30, 2025 Suresh/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neeta Singh Chandel, Ram Naresh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Sabnam Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench