HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7119 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Sharad Pathak, the learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Priya Singh and Shri Pawan Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri H.J.S. Parihar, the learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Amit Singh, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3, who has put in appearance in another writ petition listed in the fresh list today bearing Matter Under Article 227 No.7111 of 2025. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the validity of an order dated 30.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) II/A.C.J.M., Ayodhya in Regular Suit No.986 of 2025 whereby the trial Court has passed an ex-parte order of ad-interim injunction on the date of filing of the suit and has directed all the parties to the suit to maintain status-quo regarding the property in question, not to create any third party interest and not to raise any construction. The trial Court issued notices to the defendants. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has admitted that the petitioners have put in appearance before the trial Court and have filed an application for obtaining copies of the documents on 06.11.2025. They have not filed any application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC for vacation/modification of the ex-parte interim injunction order dated 30.07.2025 and they have filed the present petition under Article 227 on 08.12.2025. 4. Without going in to the merits of the case, when the ex-parte order of ad- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priya Singh, Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sri Baldeshik Sopan Trust Ayodhya Thru. Managing Trustee Govind Kumar Lohia And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) Sri Thakur Venkatesh Ji Maharaj Virajman Sri Venktesh Mandir Ayodhya Thru. Sarvarahkar And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) interim injunction is in existence since 30.07.2025, the petitioners have already put in appearance in the suit and they are yet to file an application for vacation of the temporary injunction order, this petition is disposed off by directing the petitioners to file an application for vacation of the temporary injunction order/objections against the temporary injunction application within a period of three days from today. The plaintiffs in the suit will file their reply/rejoinder affidavit within a period of one week thereafter. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the application for temporary injunction application expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of filing of the stay vacation application. December 16, 2025 -Amit K- A227 No. 7119 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench