Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180419 (MAD)

C.MAHENDIRAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/45107/2025 · 2025-11-25

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 45107 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 45107 of 2025 1. C.Mahendiran S/o.Chinnadurai, Residing At Door No.466, Magudapaar Street, Vilambar Village, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District-606 202 Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector District Collectorate Office, Kallakurichi District 2.The District Revenue Officer District Collectorate Office, Kallakurichi District 3.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District 4.The Superintendent Of Police Office Of The Superintendent Of Police, Kallakurichi District 5.The Inspector Of Police Kallakurichi District Police Station, Kallakurichi District 6.Vijaya Raghavan Sub Inspector Of Police, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 45107 of 2025 Kallakurichi Police Station, Kallakurichi District Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 4th respondents herein to take action on the 5th and 6th respondents herein not to interfere in any manner with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property comprised in Survey No.127/6B as per Patta No.9361, situated at Kallakurichi village, Kallakurichi Taluk and District. For Petitioner(s): Mr. D.Murugan Mr.B.Cheliyan For Respondent: Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate[Crl Side] for R4 to R6 ORDER This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take action against the respondents 5 and 6 and restrain the respondents 5 and 6 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. 2. Heard Mr.D.Murugan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.L.Baskaran, learned Government Advocate[Crl Side] for Respondents 4 to 6. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 45107 of 2025 3. In the considered view of this Court, this writ petition is totally misconceived. Respondents 1 to 4 have no power or jurisdiction to take action against respondents 5 and 6. If according to the petitioner the respondents 5 and 6 have exceeding their powers, the petitioner can only seek for an appropriate direction before the concerned authority and the present writ petition is not maintainable. 4. In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. 25-11-2025 rka Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 45107 of 2025 To 1.The District Collector District Collectorate Office, Kallakurichi District 2.The District Revenue Officer District Collectorate Office, Kallakurichi District 3.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District 4.The Superintendent Of Police Office Of The Superintendent Of Police, Kallakurichi District 5.The Inspector Of Police Kallakurichi District Police Station, Kallakurichi District 6.Vijaya Raghavan Sub Inspector Of Police, Kallakurichi Police Station, Kallakurichi District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 45107 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. rka WP No. 45107 of 2025 25-11-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis