AJEET KUMAR WADHWANI (IN FIR AJEET WADHWANI) AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
/11317/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180417 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180417 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11317 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1-3, and Sri Himanshu Suryavanshi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4. 2. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"I. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned First Information Report No.427 of 2025 under section 351(3), 352, 115(2), 110 of BNS, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya, lodged by opposite party No.4, on the basis of compromise, in the interest of justice. (contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition). II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite party no.3 to not arrest the petitioners in respect of FIR dated 20.08.2025, bearing No.427 of 2025 under section 351(3), 352, 115(2), 110 of BNS, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya, in the interest of justice. III. Issue such other order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the circumstances of the case in the favour of the petitioners, and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Singh, Ravi Shankar Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Himanshu Suryavanshi, Shubham Singh Ajeet Kumar Wadhwani (In Fir Ajeet Wadhwani) And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
IV. Award the costs of the writ petition in favour of the petitioners."
3. Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioners and respondents have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated 12.11.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-3 to the petition. 4. This Court vide order dated 02.12.2025 had required the compromise deed to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise. 5. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 02.12.2025, the Senior Registrar of this Court vide his report dated 09.12.2025 has verified the compromise between the petitioners and respondents. 6. As per the said compromise, the petitioners and respondents have agreed to end the dispute between themselves amicably. 7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed.
The proceedings of First Information Report No.427 of 2025 under section 351(3), 352, 115(2), 110 of BNS, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya, are hereby quashed. December 16, 2025 V. Sinha CRLP No. 11317 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench