SIDDHARTHA RAI v. SRI TARUN GAUBA, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, LKO.
/2173/2025 · 2025-11-20
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180409 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180409 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2173 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions has submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order dated 11.12.2024, the appeal of the applicant has been decided vide order dated 22.11.2024, copy of which has been produced during course of argument which is taken on record and the photocopy of the same has been provided to learned counsel for the applicant today. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, if any, stands discharged. November 20, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey, Aditya Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Siddhartha Rai .....Applicant(s) Sri Tarun Gauba, Inspector General Of Police, Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench