Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180399 (ALL)

RAM KEVAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

CRLP/8470/2024 · 2025-11-11

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8470 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA and Sri Mohd. Yasin, learned counsel for the respondent nos.6 and 7. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the F.I.R. dated 05.10.2024 vide Case Crime No.001/2024, under Sections 103(1) & 238 BNSS, Police Station Baskhari, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions, submits that the offence in the impunged F.I.R. relates to Police Station KodaiCanal, District Dindigul, State Tamil Nadu, therefore, the process is going on for transfer of the F.I.R. and the same shall be completed expeditiously. Thus, this petition before this Court is not maintainable, which could not be disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the private respondent. 4. Dismissed accordingly, with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate court, if required. November 11, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Tripathi, Rakesh Dwivedi, Ravi Prakash Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Anurag Kumar Singh, Mohd.Yasin (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Ram Keval .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench