Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180374 (ALL)

HARIRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

/9179/2025 · 2025-12-02

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9179 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents no.1 to 4. 2. No notice be issued to private respondents taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the official respondents to conduct fair investigation against the accused persons in Case Crime No. 0022 of 2025 under Sections 365, 307, 302, 147, 504, 506, 342, 364, 120-B IPC, Police Station Baldirai, District Sultanpur. 4. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Mukul Bharti, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Baldirai, District Sultanpur, states that a final report has been filed in the Court on 03.07.2025. 5. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 2, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Hariram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench