Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180367 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/9005/2024 · 2025-11-19

Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9005 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Shri Nikhil Singh, learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions, submits that charge sheet dated 06.12.2024 was forwarded in the matter, hence the petition has lost its efficacy. 3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy as may be available under law, if already not availed, to which there is no objection by the other side. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. November 19, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Amit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench