Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180346 (ALL)

RAVI @ PINKESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/6428/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6428 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.98 of 2025, under Sections 64(1), 62, 332(c), 351(3), 352 of BNS and Section 3/ of POCSO Act, Police Station Kasimpur, District Hardoi. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was along at home when the applicant entered and started misbehaving with her, however, before the applicant do anything, the elder daughter came and raise hue and cry and thereafter, the applicant ran away. Similar statement was given under Section 180 of BNSS. In the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the allegation of rape was levelled. The medical report on record does not corroborate the allegation of rape. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the two statements of the victim and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 07.04.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : D.P. Dutt Tiwari, Anil Kumar, Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Ram Prasad Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Roshan Babu Gupta Ravi @ Pinkesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Ravi @ Pinkesh be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 28, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 6428 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench