RAJEEV KUMAR v. UPPER AYUKT IST LUCKNOW and 5 ORS.
WRIC/1000716/2005 · 2025-11-12
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180342 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180342 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1000716 of 2005 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. The case is called out.
2. Seen the office report dated 29.10.2025. As per office report, card notice was issued through registered post to O.P. No.2 on 20.09.2025 dispatched on 25.09.2025, which has been received back with remark address cannot be located, returned.
3. Undelivered cover of notice issued to the petitioner on 20.09.2025 dispatched on 25.09.2025 has not been received back nor any vakalatnama has been filed till date, therefore, service of notice is deemed to be sufficient in view of Chapter VIII Rule 12 Explanation II of High Court Rules.
4. No -one appears for the petitioner, however, Sri Devesh Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
5. The case is dismissed as abated. November 12, 2025 Adarsh K Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : V.K. Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., R.N. Gupta (Irshad Ali,J.) Rajeev Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Upper Ayukt Ist Lucknow And 5 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ADARSH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench