Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180336 (ALL)

PRIYANKA v. DIRECTOR OF BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSHTAHAR U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14634/2025 · 2025-12-17

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14634 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite party Nos.1, 2 & 3. 2. In view of order being passed, issuance of notice to opposite party No.4 stands dispensed with. 3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to cancel appointment of opposite party No.4 on the post of Anganwadi Worker. 4. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently neither the appointment letter of opposite party No.4 could be annexed to the petition nor appropriate prayer could be made. 5. In view thereof, petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file a fresh petition. December 17, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Priyanka .....Petitioner(s) Director Of Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench