HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7266 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. while notice on behalf of respondent No.3 has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide restoration application No.3323/2024 under Section 201 of L.R. Act "Ram Pratap Pandey Vs. Diwakar Pandey and others in revision No.1636/2022, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is decided in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1- Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide restoration application No.3323/2024 under Section 201 of L.R. Act "Ram Pratap Pandey Vs. Diwakar Pandey and others in revision No.1636/2022,, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Pandey, Pawan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Pratap Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lko. Thru. Member And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench