Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180328 (MAD)

G.JAGADEESWARI v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/46661/2025 · 2025-11-28

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 46661 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 46661 of 2025 and WMP NO. 52066 OF 2025 G.Jagadeeswari Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Tiruppur District. 2.The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur District. 4.The Assistant Director, Department Of Geology And Mining, Tiruppur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER; This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for records of the impugned demand notice dated 08.07.2025,bearing Na.Ka.3009/2025/A3,passed by the 3rd respondent, pertaining to the lease granted in favour of the petitioners erstwhile Partnership firm and another lease granted in favour of Petitioners husband Late Mr.S.A.Ganeshun, and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary. For Petitioner(s): M/s.G.Vignesh For Respondent: Mr.Stalin Abimanyu, AGP ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned demand notice dated 08.07.2025, bearing Na.Ka.3009/2025/A3, passed by the 3rd respondent, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46661 of 2025 pertaining to the lease granted in favour of the petitioners erstwhile Partnership firm and another lease granted in favour of Petitioners husband Late Mr.S.A.Ganeshun. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as against the impugned order, there is an effective appeal remedy available before the first respondent under Rule 36(c) of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959. Hence, this Court without going into the merits of the case, permit the petitioner to make appeal before the first respondent. 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents have not raised any objection in this regard. 4. Heard the learned counsel for both side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the limited request sought for by the petitioner, this court, without interfering with the impugned order, permits the petitioner to prefer appeal as against the impugned order passed by the third respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon filing the same, the first respondent shall entertain the same and pass appropriate orders within the period of six weeks thereafter. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46661 of 2025 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 28-11-2025 rli Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The District Collector, Tiruppur District. 2.The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur District. 4.The Assistant Director, Department Of Geology And Mining, Tiruppur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 46661 of 2025 M.DHANDAPANI J. rli WP No. 46661 of 2025 28-11-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis