Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180320 (ALL)

SUKAN @ SUKAN HARIJAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/2354/2024 · 2025-11-18

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2354 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted qua petitioner nos. 1 and 2 and chargesheet has been filed qua petitioner no. 3 and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned AGA for the State does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 18, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Deepak Kumar Tripathi, Pradeep Kumar, Seema Kashyap (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Sukan @ Sukan Harijan And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench