Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180298 (ALL)

SURAJ GAUTAM @ SURAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/650/2025 · 2025-11-19

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 650 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No.130 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 351(2) B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Bakshi Ka Talab, District - Lucknow. 3. It is argued that the applicant was granted the ad-interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 10.06.2025 and now a charge-sheet has been filed and nothing has been stated that the applicant did not cooperate with the investigation, as such, the ad-interim bail granted to the applicant is extended till the conclusion of the trial. 4. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed. 5. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Suraj Gautam @ Suraj be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each separately to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shamshad Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ashid Ali, Mohammad Kashif Suraj Gautam @ Suraj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 19, 2025 VNP/- NABAIL No. 650 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench