KAMLESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LUCKNOW
BAIL/11750/2024 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180292 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180292 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11750 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Anubhav Singh Patel, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.282 of 2024 under Sections 302 IPC, P.S.- Gangaghat, District- Unnao. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the son of the informant, aged about 28 years had gone on a motorcycle towards the river and when his sister called him, he was crying and shouting. Subsequently, his body was found. The name of applicant and the other co-accused persons were taken based upon the suspicion that they had gone along with the deceased. In light of the said, learned counsel for the applicant has drawn my attention to the statement of the daughter of the informant wherein she stated that the deceased came on a motorcycle and started speaking inappropriately against her which was explained by the father of the informant. However, he did not stop and was attacked by all the accused on account of anger, which resulted in his death. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the nature of the evidence and allegation that the incident occurred on account of an altercation and anger coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 16.06.2024 and has no previous criminal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anita, Devendra Pratap, Durga Prasad, Saad Husain, Shashank Shekhar Singh, Shohit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Dheeraj Awasthi Kamlesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow .....Opposite Party(s)
antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant- Kamlesh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11750 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench