- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2435 WP No. 47877 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 47877 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI Y.T.NARENDRA BABU S/O Y.THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.3, YALEMANE, I MAIN, I STAGE, I CROSS, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHRIKANTH GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G.A.SRIKANTE GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-100 001. 2. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF DIVISIONAL, RETAIL SALES MANAGER, BANGALORE DIVISION, NO.29. P.KALINGA RAO ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027. 3. M/S I.B.P.COMPANY LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (MARKETING), I.B.P.HOUSE, NO.34-A, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2435 WP No. 47877 of 2017 NIRMAL CHANDRA STREET, CALCUTTA-700 013. 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER (SOUTH REGION), I.B.P.COMPANY LIMITED, NO.10, MAYOR, V.R.RAMANATHAN ROAD, CHETPUT, CHENNAI-600 031. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.PRAMOD., CGC FOR R1; SRI. GURURAJ., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SANTHOSH.R.NELKUDRI., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Shrikanth Gowda., counsel on behalf of Sri.G.A.Srikante Gowda., for the petitioner and Sri.B.Pramod., counsel for respondent No.1 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2435 WP No. 47877 of 2017 When queried, counsel Sri.Shrikanth Gowda., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner about the infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2