SADIQ ABBAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/8688/2016 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180276 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180276 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 8688 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, counsel for respondent no. 3 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 20, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Lakhan Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Neeraj Chaurasiya (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sadiq Abbas .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench