Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180270 (ALL)

AMIT SHRIVASTAVA @ PINTU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/10214/2025 · 2025-11-03

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10214 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.468 of 2024 under Sections 103(1) BNS, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Unnao. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the sister of the informant was married to the applicant. Subsequently, their relations were not good and the applicant was suspecting her, as such, he had killed her with the use of sharp edged weapon. Subsequently, informant has turned hostile. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the informant has turned hostile coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 17.07.2024 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Amit Shrivastava @ Pintu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhir Kumar Rai, Devesh Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Shrivastava @ Pintu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 3, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 10214 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench