HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 513 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shankar Dayal Jaiswal, Rohit Jaiswal, Shesh Ram Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi, Shobhit Mohan Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Chandra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Basic Edu.Lko. And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench