Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180254 (ALL)

KARAM DAYAL LOHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/9212/2025 · 2025-10-29

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9212 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.583 of 2022 under Section 302 IPC, P.S.- Kadipur, District- Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the informant used to work as a clerk and on the date of the incident, the deceased had a fight with the applicant and his wife and subsequently, both of them had killed the deceased. The cause of death as per the post mortem report are two lacerated wounds on the neck and the jaw. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that apart from the apprehension expressed, there is no eye witness to the incident and solely on the basis of the alleged apprehension, the applicant has been linked with the offence in question. No recovery has been made from the applicant. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, substantive pre- trial detention undergone by the applicant and there being no eye witness of the alleged crime coupled with the fact that the applicant is in judicial custody since 17.01.2023 having no criminal history, I am of the view that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sukh Deo Singh, Iqbal Ahmed Ahmedullah, Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Karam Dayal Lohra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Karam Dayal Lohra be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9212 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench