Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18024 (RAJ)

SANDEEP SAULET @ SUKHA SHUTAR S/O KALURAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6040/2025 · 2025-07-02

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24316] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IV Bail Application No. 6040/2025 Sandeep Saulet @ Sukha Shutar S/o Kaluram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dhani Dehki Ki, Tan Preetampuri, Police Station Thoi, District Neemkathana (At Present Accused Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Garssa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 02/07/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 249/2023 registered at Police Station Thoi district Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 307/149, 427 of IPC 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that accused is aged approximately 21 years. It is further submitted that medical report of the victim reflects that other than knee pain no major injury is inflicted upon the victim. Furthermore, it is submitted that the complainant has strong criminal antecedents registered against him/her. Lastly, it is submitted that erstwhile orders of the Court are distinguishable. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the present bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:24316] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6040/2025] 4. Having heard and considered the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that accused- applicant is aged approximately 21 years; that accused is in custody since 2023; that there are no life threatening injuries inflicted upon the victim and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him/her on bail. 5. Accordingly, the fourth bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Sandeep Saulet @ Sukha Shutar S/o Kaluram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /27