Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180238 (ALL)

GAURSONS HI-TECH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. THRU. ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DIVYANSHU SRIVASTAVA v. DINESH SINGH

RERAD/68/2025 · 2025-12-03

S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW RERA APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 68 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. At the very outset, Shri Samrat Vaish, learned counsel for appellant submits that the appellant does not want to press the instant appeal and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn as the matter has already been settled between the parties outside the Court. He prayed for the withdrawal of the present appeal. 2. In view of the aforesaid statement and the prayer made, the instant appeal is consigned to record as withdrawn. December 3, 2025 Virendra Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Samrat Vaish Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shruti Kumar, Sukhmani Singh (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Its Authorized Representative Divyanshu Srivastava .....Appellant(s) Dinesh Singh .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench