HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1738 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 06 of 2025, under sections 8/22/29 of N.D.P.S, P.S. C.B.N, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent. The applicant has received a notice under Section 67 of the N.D.P.S Act, issued by the prosecuting agency and he apprehends his arrest. He further submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is neither the owner, nor the tenant of the said godown. The alleged tenancy agreement is not signed by the applicant, the said tenancy agreement is on record. 4. Per Contra, Shri S.M Singh Royekwar, learned counsel for the C.B.N has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application and has drawn attention of the court towards the internal page-4 of the rejection order dated 07.10.2025 and has submitted that huge recovery of psychotropic substances has been made, which is multiple times more than the commercial quantity thus, custodial interrogation is required. The applicant is the tenant of the godown and he himself has filed the tenancy agreement, hence, it is not a case of false implication and no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. 5. Perused the record. 6. The learned trial court, while rejecting the anticipatory bail application, has Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aashish Misra, Sudhir Kumar, Suhail Kashif Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : S M Singh Royekwar Ankur Mishra .....Applicant(s) U.O.I Thru. Central Bureau Of Narcotics Distt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) recorded the following findings:-- " ्ऺĥतुत मामले मȅ िनवारक दल ने ्ऺाथȃ DZारा िकराये पर िलये गये गोदाम को सील िकया तथा गोदाम की तलाशी के दौरान अġ्ऺाजोलम 18,47,850 गोिलयाँ = 18,47,850 x 0.00012 िकलोŎाम = 221.742 िकलोŎाम, Ĝयू्ऺेनॉिफन इंजेĆशन 13,175 एĞĚयूल = 13,175 x 0.6 िमलीŎाम = 0.7905 िकलोŎाम, पȅटाजोसाइन इंजेĆशन 700 एĞĚयूल 700 x 30 िमलीŎाम = 2.1 िकलोŎाम, Ŗामाडोल 2,19,670 कै Ěसूल 2,19,670 x 0.00045 िकलोŎाम = 98.8515 िकलोŎाम, कोडीन फॉĥफे ट 5,355 बोतलȅ = 5,355 x 100 Ŏाम = 535.5 िकलोŎाम एवं Ćलोनाजेपम टैबलेट 1,670 टैबलेट = 1.670 x 0.00012 िकलोŎाम = 0.2004 िकलोŎाम को जĜत िकया गया। िववेचना के Ōम मȅ मामले के सह-अिभयुǘ सूरज कु मार िमũा पुś ũी कौशल िकशोर िमũा, मेससă ęयू मंगलम एजȅसीè के मािलक को एनडीपीएस अिधिनयम, 1985 की धारा 67 के अंतगăत सĞमन भेजा है। ्ऺाथȃ को जांच मȅ नोिटस देने माś के आधार पर जांच एजेęसी DZारा उसके िगरěतारी की ्ऺबल सĞभावना उĕपęन होना नहȂ कहा जा सकता है। उपरोǘ तĖयȋ से ्ऺथमɯǸया यह दिशत नहȂ होता है िक ्ऺाथȃ को जानबूझकर उसकी सामािजक ्ऺितǹा व उǥके भिवĤय को बबाăद करने के उǩेģय से उसे ्ऺģनगत मामले मȅ पूछताछ हेतु नोिटस ्ऺेिषत की गयी है। उपरोǘ तĖयȋ एवं पिरिĥथितयȋ को ɯिǸगत रखते ɷए मामले के गुणदोष पर िबना कोई अिभमत Dzǘ िकये ्ऺाथȃ को अिŎम जमानत ्ऺाथăना पś ĥवीकार करने का आधार पयाăĚत नहȂ है। आदेश ्ऺाथȃ अंकु र िमũ की ओर से अपराध संćया-06/2025/CBN/LKO अंतगăत धारा-8/22/29 एन.डी.पी.एस. एĆट थाना सी.बी. एन. िजला लखनऊ मȅ ्ऺĥतुत ्ऺथम अिŎम जमानत ्ऺाथăना पś खािरज िकया जाता है।" 7. Perusal of the rejection order shows that the recovered quantity is multiple times more than the commercial quantity and several psychotropic substances have been recovered. The applicant is alleged to be the tenant of the godown in question from where the recovery has been made. The applicant himself has filed the tenancy agreement, prima facie, the complicity of the applicant is evident and custodial interrogation is required, thus no case of anticipatory bail is made out and I do not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 8. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail stands rejected. November 17, 2025 DiVYa NABAIL No. 1738 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench