SUSHANT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HIGHER EDU. LUKCNOWandORS
WRIA/5360/2020 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180215 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180215 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5360 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to record. December 16, 2025 DiVYa Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anam Som Ratna Maurya, Anjali Ratnesh, Prahlad Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., R.K. Srivastava (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sushant Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Addl. Chief Secy. Higher Edu. Lukcnowandors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench