Kadmisetty Kameswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/16451/2020 · 2025-09-08
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18021 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18021 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010250172020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16451/2020 Between:
KADMISETTY KAMESWARA RAO,, S/O.(LATE) VEERRAJU, HINDU, EX- MUNICIPAL COUNCILOR,
AGED S0YEARS,
R/O. D.NO.9-19-4, BOGGARAPU STREET/SUNKARAVARI STREET,
ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLE TOWN P.S, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLE TOWN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. SREEDHARALA SATYANARAYANA, S/ O. (LATE) MANIKYAM, HINDU, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.9-19-25, SUNKARAVARI STREET, ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondents 4 and 5 in calling the Petitioner to the Police Station every day and interfering over the subject matter property of the suit covered in
2
0.S.No.138 of 2018 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalle, i.e., the shed and vacant site with Door No.9-23-5, Sunkaravari Street, Anakapalle, at the instance of the 6th Respondent and without initiating any action against the 6th Respondent pursuant to the F.I.R. in Crime No.1907 of 2020, dt.7.8.2020, despite the representation of the Petitioners to the Respondents 2 to 4, dt. 20-07-2020 is nothing but high handed, unlawful, un unreasonable and unjust and in violation of the Fundamental Rights of the Petitioner guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 initiate further action pursuant to the F.I.R in Crime No.1907 of 2020, dt.7.8.2020, registered by the 4th Respondent against the 6th Respondent and some others and further consequently directing the Respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with the possession of the Petitioner over the subject matter property of the suit 0.S.No.138 of 2018 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalle.”
2.
Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, based on the complaint of the unofficial Respondent, a crime has been registered against the Petitioner and on enquiry, Police having found that the matter is of civil nature, closed the said crime. It is further submitted that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri P.Rajesh Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.09.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.16451 of 2020
Dt.09.09.2025
Dinesh