HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7015 of 2025 Court No. - 22 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Kamlesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Yogesh Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The instant petitioner has been filed seeking direction to respondent no.2/Tehsildar to decide the restoration application in Case No. 3066/2023/RST/10207/2025, computerized case no. T202304040403066/T202504040410207, filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code within stipulated time. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the application under Section 34 of the Code, 2006 was dismissed for want of prosecution on 17.11.2023 and to recall that order, the petitioner filed a recall/restoration application dated 13.11.2025 which is still pending. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the Tehsildar concerned to decide the recall/restoration application of the petitioner. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the recall/restoration application dated 17.11.2023 as expeditiously as possible in the light of directions issued by this Court in the judgement of Daya Shankar vs. State of U.P. and others, reported in 2023 (6) ADJ 181. December 4, 2025 Vandana Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar, Aman Kumar Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Deepak Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench