\ \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13685 OF 2025 Between: Pulimi Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Late Lakshmi Narayana, Aged 52 years, Occ: Nill R/o. D.No.20-13-118, Mutyala Peta, Chirala, Bapatia District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Bapatia, Bapatia District. 3. The Station House Officer, Chirala I Town Police Station Chirala, Bapatia District. 4. Nangu Satyanarayana Reddy, S/o. Not known Aged 50 years, Occ. Business, R/o.Gollapalem, Near Ramayalayam, Perala, Chirala. 5. Nangu Veera Raghavamma, W/o. Satyanarayana Reddy Aged 43 years, Occ; not known, R/o.Gollapalem, Near Ramayalayam, Perala, Chirala 6. Buchi Babu, S/o. Not known Aged 35 years, Occ; Job, R/o.Near Church, Thotavari Palem, Chirala. 7. Jaya Lakshmi, W/o. Not known Aged 40 years, Occ; not known R/o. Gollapalem, Chirala. 8. Pittu Prasad, S/o. Not known Aged 37 years, Occ; Job, R/o. Near Krishna Temple, Gavinivaripalem, Chirala. 9. S.S.Srinivas, S/o. Not Known Aged not known, O/o. SBI Bank Manager Brundhavan Gardens Branch, Guntur. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents, particularly 3rd respondent in not registering the crime on my repeated complaints, dated 29-01-2025,24-03-2025 against the respondents 4 to 9 on the file of 3rd respondent, in spite of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in “Lalita Kumari vs Govt.of U.P. and Ors illegal, irregular, irrational, amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the crime and prosecute the accused persons for appropriate offences and penal provisions of law. as lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to register the crime on my complaint dated 29.01.2025 and prosecute the accused persons for appropriate offences and penal provisions of law, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JAMADAGNI CHITTALA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 to 9: —- The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010249782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0^ [3457] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13685/2025 Between; Pulimi Srinivasa Rao ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.JAMADAGNI CHITTALA Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Jamadagni Chittala Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 3. Three CD Copies [OUT] TF HIGH COURT \ DATED:16/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.13685 of 2025 I r? Mil ms Current ieciion DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS