Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 180178 (ALL)

SATENDRA PRATAP GUPTA (IN FIR MENTIONED AS SATENDRA PRATAP SINGH GUPTA) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/7865/2025 · 2025-10-30

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7865 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and Sri Adarsh Verma, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2 and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Case No.117598 of 2023 arising out of FIR No.221 of 2022, under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Naka Hindola, District Lucknow including the order dated 02.08.2025 by means of which bailable warrant has been issued against petitioner with a further prayer to quash the order dated 09.08.2023 passed by the Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, CBI, (AP) Lucknow. 3. In pursuance of the order passed earlier by this Court, opposite party no.2 is present in the Court. On asking whether she is ready and willing for mediation, she has refused the same. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merits. However, he submits that applicant will surrender before the trial court and apply for bail. He prays that the applicant may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (AIR 2022 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sumeet Tahilramani, Ravi Dubey, Surya Bhan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Adarsh Verma, Rajan Mishra Satendra Pratap Gupta (In Fir Mentioned As Satendra Pratap Singh Gupta) .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) SC 3386). 5. It is, therefore, directed that in case the applicant surrenders before the Court below within three weeks from today and prefers bail application, the trial court will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 6. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 7. The application stands disposed of. October 30, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 7865 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench