W.P.No.47509 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.12.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.47509 of 2025 K.Saravanan S/o. Kulanthaivel ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, O/o. The District Collectorate, Namakkal District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal District. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE, Namakkal District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.02.2025 and pass such further orders. For Petitioner : M/s.G.Munuraj For Respondents : Mr.Senthil Murugan Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader for R3 (HR & CE) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.47509 of 2025 ORDER This writ petition is filed to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.02.2025. 2. When the matter came up for admission, a third party by name Mr.Kokilan wanted to oppose the writ petition by stating that the writ petition is not maintainable and fit person is already appointed. 3. However, Mr.G.Munuraj, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the direction in the writ petition is to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10.02.2025 and the same is already disposed of by a communication dated 17.03.2025 and as such, nothing survives in the matter. 4. Mr.S.Ravichandran, learned Additional Government Pleader who takes notice for the 3rd respondent / HR & CE Department would submit that as per the stand of the Department, the petitioner was not even a Dharmakartha at any point of time. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.47509 of 2025 5. Be that as it may, the writ petition is filed for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation. The learned Counsel for the petitioner himself states that the prayer has since been complied with in as much as the representation has already been considered. 6. Recording the above submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 08.12.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No veda To 1. The District Collector, O/o. The District Collectorate, Namakkal District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal District. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE, Namakkal District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.47509 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. veda W.P.No.47509 of 2025 08.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis