HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4736 of 2019 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. List revised. The matter pertains to the year 2019. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this petition. Shri Neeraj Kumar Pandey, Advocate appearing on behalf of learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and learned A.G.A. are present. From perusal of the record, in the present case, no interim/stay order is operating. It appears that the case has lost its relevance due to efflux of time and has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. November 25, 2025 Shukla Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anita, Gauri Suwan Pandey, Satya Prakash Mishra, Satya Prakash Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sandeep Kumar Srivastava, Sarveshwar Mehrotra (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Amit Virma @ Vikki And Ors. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench