ARVIND PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/10254/2025 · 2025-11-04
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180142 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180142 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10254 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to respondent no.4 is dispensed with.
3. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 02.03.2017 bearing FIR/Case Crime No.0071 of 2017, under Sections 302 & 201 I.P.C., Police Station Lambhua, District Sultanpur. Further prayer is for a mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 and 3 to not arrest or harass the petitioner in compliance of impugned FIR.
4. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid FIR was lodged against unknown person under Sections 302 & 201 Indian Penal Code, 1860.
5. Final report had been submitted by the authority. Subsequent thereto upon a protest application being filed by the respondent No.5, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur vide order dated 26.04.2022, a copy of which Annexure- 7 to the writ petition directed for further investigation.
6. Learned A.G.A. states that subsequent thereto during the course of the investigation the offences now applicable have been changed from Sections Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhup Chandra Singh, Abdul Raheem Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Arvind Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
302 & 201 I.P.C. to Section 306 I.P.C. He specifically states that investigation is on going but till date the complicity of the petitioner has not emerged.
7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to conclude the investigation in accordance with law. However, the petitioner shall not be arrested till completion of the investigation or credible evidence is found against the petitioner. November 4, 2025 Reena/- CRLP No. 10254 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench