INDERPRASTHA ENGINEERING COLLEGE THRU. DIRECTOR PROF. DR. ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ANUBHAG I LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/10279/2025 · 2025-11-03
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180136 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180136 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10279 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Amit Jaiswal, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sandeep Srivastava, the learned Standing Counsel for the State and Ms. Aditi Tripathi, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3- APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forthwith reopen or enable the pre-registration ERP web portal on its official web platform for the academic session 2025-26 for all duly admitted eligible students of engineering and management stream as the list annexed as annexure No.16 under the management quota of the petitioner's institution, so as to complete their pre-registration and enrollment formality for the purpose of examination. 3. The petitioner contends that the brochure published by the U.P. Technical Admission Council provides 15% seats will be filled by management quota and 85% seats will be filled through counseling. Clause 3.1 of the brochure provides that the seats in management/NRI quota shall be filled within 15 days of the last date of counselling or before the last specified by the respective regulatory body (whichever is earlier). The counseling in the present case has continued till 15 September 2025 and thereafter no time has been granted to the petitioner for filling up seats in management quota. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 has submitted on the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Jaiswal Ojus Law, Tanveer Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Atul Kumar Dwivedi Inderprastha Engineering College Thru. Director Prof. Dr. Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Technical Education Anubhag I Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
basis of written instructions provided to her that although the portal was open but some students could not take admission in the management quota due to some technical glitch which has been now removed and the portal is expected to be opened soon. She has further submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme court has extended the time for completion of admission related formalities till 15.11.2025 and, therefore, the petitioner's grievance will be redressed upon opening of the portal by the respondent Nos.2 and
3. 5.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed off by recording the aforesaid statement of the learned counsel for the opposite parties made on the basis of written instruction provided by the authority concerned. November 3, 2025 -Amit K- WRIC No. 10279 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench