AZEEMUDDIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/939/2025 · 2025-11-19
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 939 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.230 of 2024, under sections 105, 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S. Khamaria, District Kheri. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on account of petty dispute in between children of informant and children of applicant a report was registered under Section 115(2) and 352 BNS. Subsequently the applicant came armed with lathi and danda and attacked husband of the informant which resulted in substantial injuries and death thereafter. Post mortem report on record indicates presence of three contusion injuries on the left side of the head, abdomen and shoulder which is also the cause of death. The applicant in custody since 27.8.2024 and has no criminal history. The co accused were granted benefit of anticipatory bail by this Court. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the allegations in the FIR and there being absence of pre meditated intent, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 27.8.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhupendra Veer Singh, Abhishek Kumar Singh, Pawan Kumar Maurya, Siddhant Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Bhupendra Nath Tripathi Azeemuddin .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Azeemuddin be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 19, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 939 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench