DURE SHAHWR ZAHEER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO AND 2 OTHERS
/13419/2025 · 2025-11-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13419 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.K. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Ms. Jyoti Bharti, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Abhinav Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 & 3 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :-
"Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties to make the payment of arrear of annual increment as payable to the Petitioner as per relevant government orders and thereafter also make the payment arrear of 1st ACP alongwith interest within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2/Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Unnao and the opposite party no. 2 may be
directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection to the
contentions aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui, Shiv Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Abhinav Singh Dure Shahwr Zaheer .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 2/ Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Unnao within a period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of four weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. November 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13419 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench