HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5397 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Learned AGA has filed counter affidavit on behalf of State today in Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted against the petitioners and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. In view of the statement made, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 7, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Mahesh Maurya And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench