Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18006 (MAD)

K.SURESH v. S.V.ROOP CHANDAR,

CRL OP/3721/2025 · 2025-02-13

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.3721 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.02.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.3721 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.2446 of 2025 K.Suresh ... Petitioner Vs S.V.Roop Chandar ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records and set aside the order in Crl.M.P.No.74131 of 2024 in STC.No.4955 of 2022 dated 07.01.2025 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track Court II at Allikulam, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Venkateswaran ORDER This petition has been filed challenging the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.74131 of 2024 in STC.No.4955 of 2022 dated 07.01.2025 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track Court II at Allikulam, Chennai, thereby dismissing the petition under Section 91 of Cr.P.C seeking production of income tax returns of the respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3721 of 2025 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials placed on record. 3. The respondent is the complainant in the complaint lodged for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act as against the petitioner. After cross examination of PW1, the petitioner filed an application under Section 91 of Cr.P.C for production of income tax returns of the respondent and the same was dismissed. Hence, this petition. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent did not even disclose on what date he had lent the money and on what date the cheque was issued. 5. Admittedly, the petitioner did not challenge the source of income and the petitioner also failed to send any reply notice for the statutory notice issued under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Therefore, the income tax documents has nothing to do with the present case and the Trial Court had rightly dismissed the petition filed under Section 91 of Cr.P.C and this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.74131 of 2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3721 of 2025 in STC.No.4955 of 2022 dated 07.01.2025 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track Court II at Allikulam, Chennai. The Trial Court is directed to complete the Trial in STC.No.4955 of 2022, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. 13.02.2025 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order mn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.3721 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To 1. The Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track Court II at Allikulam, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P.No.3721 of 2025 13.02.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis