[2025:JHHC:18496] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5593 of 2025 ------ 1. Laxmi Chakarvati @ Laxmi Chakarvarti aged about 27 years, wife of Anup Kumar Chakarverti, resident of Swarg Chhira, P.O. and P.S. Dhalbhumgarh, Dist.- East Singhbhum 2. M. Vijay Kumar aged about 33 years, S/o M. Natrajan, resident of Traffic Colony, near Durgamandap, P.O. Tatanagar, P.S. Bagbera, District East Singhbhum. 3. Jagarnath Gorai @ Jagannath Gorai, aged about 21 years, son of Satyavan Gorai, resident of near GYM Ghorabanda, Kamputra Basti, P.O. Luyabasa, P.S. Govindpur, District East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Dilip Kr. Chakraverty, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 09-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection Galudih P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 115 (2), 117 (2), 126 (2), 3 (5), 109, 351 (3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25 (1-B) (a)/26 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder Tarapada Mahato by assaulting him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 14.05.2025 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Ghatsila in connection with Galudih P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/