Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:27213 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4100 of 2025 Petitioner :- Barsati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Shitala Sahay Srivastav,Sudhir Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 27.08.2024 passed by Respondent No. 2 in the Case No.1349 of 2024 Computerized No.T2024914360413429 Kankad Vs. Gram Sabha Under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue code-2006. ii. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to Respondent No. 3 - Consolidation Officer-first, Kartapur, District-Jaunpur, U.P. to proceed the further proceeding of the objection of the Section 9A (2) of the U.P. Holding Act-1953 of the Case Barsati Vs. Kakad and others and Case No. 101/114 of 2013 of Kankad Vs. State in stipulated time." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order dated 30.6.2013 has been recalled on a time barred restoration application filed by the respondents. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that against the order impugned, petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal as well as revision, therefore, the present writ petition may not be entertained. 5. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy, as available to him, under the law. Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad