Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18002 (KAR)

SRI SESHA SAI RAJESH DITTAKAVI v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/5863/2025 · 2025-03-05

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9522 WP No. 5863 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 5863 OF 2025 (GM-PASS) BETWEEN: SRI. SESHA SAI RAJESH DITTAKAVI, S/O. SRI. RAJENDRA PRASAD DITTAKAVI, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO. 518, 4TH CROSS, SUBBANAPALYA EXTN., BANASWADI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 043. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR H.G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SANSAD BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 100 001. 2. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, BENGALURU REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BENGALURU CITY-I, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9522 WP No. 5863 of 2025 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, K.G. HALLI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY, BENGALURU - 560 045. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MEGHA SHASHIKANTH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., CGC FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFER, AGA FOR R3 AND R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED CLOSURE OF FILE INTIMIDATION DATED 11.08.2023 VIDE NO. FCL/3154923889/2023 VIDE ANNX-G AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction for issuance of a passport to the petitioner in consideration of his application. 2. Heard Sri. Mohan Kumar H.G., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel, Smt. Megha Shashikanth along with the learned CGC, Sri. M. Unnikrishnan, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9522 WP No. 5863 of 2025 appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Sri. Mohammed Jaffer, learned AGA appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4 and have perused the material on record. 3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows: The petitioner is the holder of a Indian Passport, which was valid upto 23.08.2021. The petitioner gets embroiled in a crime in Crime No.105/2016 for certain offences. The police, after investigation, have filed a 'B' report before the concerned Court way back in the year 2021. It transpires that no order is passed on the 'B' report owing to the fact that the complainant who has filed protest petition is not appearing before the Court. In that light, the concerned Court has not taken the 'B' report to its logical conclusion. The passport of the petitioner has expired and is wanting re-issuance of the said passport. 4. Learned counsel representing No.1 - Union of India and respondent No.2 would submit that the application so filed by the petitioner has been closed on account of the pendency of the criminal case. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:9522 WP No. 5863 of 2025 5. In the light of the afore-narrated facts, I deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to submit a fresh application seeking re-issuance of the passport and respondent No.2 shall consider the same and issue necessary passport in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, as and when it is filed. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed. I.A.No.1/2025 is disposed, as a consequence. SD/- ______________________ JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 82 CT: BHK