2025:JHHC:22560-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3046 of 2025 Abhinash Kumar Bhagat, aged about 35 years son of Pradip Prasad Bhagat, resident of Mouza Baliapatra, P.O. & P.S.- Maheshpur, District- Pakur … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dy. Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Pakur, having its office at Collectorate, P.O. & P.S.- Pakur, District-Pakur. 3. Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board, represented through its Secretary, both having its office at TA Division Building (Ground Floor), H.E.C. Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi … Respondents With W.P.(C) No.3048 of 2025 M/s Four Star Stone Works, a proprietorship concern represented through one of its authorized representative Nabiut Shaikh, aged about 26 years, son of Manarul Shekh, both having their office at village- Naya Anjana, P.O. & P.S.- Prithvinagar, District- Pakur. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dy. Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Pakur, having its office at Collectorate, P.O. & P.S.- Pakur, District-Pakur. 3. Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board, represented through its Secretary, both having its office at TA Division Building (Ground Floor), H.E.C. Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi … Respondents ---------- Coram:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sachin Kumar, AAG-II 2025:JHHC:22560-DB 2 Mr. Sachin Kumar, AC to SC-I Mr. Suraj Prakash, AC to SC-VII For the Resp. JSPCB : Ms. Suman Roy, AC to Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Advocate ----- Order No.04/Dated -08.08.2025 1. Both these writ petitions have been take up together. 2. Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel along with Mr. P.A.S. Pati, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners have submitted that after interim order has been granted in these writ petitions, public hearing has already been done. 3. It has further been submitted that beyond the public hearing, there is no prayer made in these writ petitions. 4. Therefore, the submission has been made that the grievance has already been redressed. 5. Mr. Sachin Kumar, learned AAG-II appearing for the State has submitted that, if that be so, both these writ petitions may be disposed of. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and particularly considering the submission made on behalf of the writ petitioners, both these writ petitions have lost its force and, as such, rendered to be infructuous and disposed of. 7. This order is passed on the concession of the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners. 8. Interim orders passed by this Court in both these writ petitions on 30.06.2025 stand vacated. 2025:JHHC:22560-DB 3 9. Accordingly, I.A. Nos. 8417 of 2025 and 8419 of 2025 also stand disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Rajnish/R.K.