INDRESH KUMAR v. U.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD. THRU M.D. LUCKNOW
WRIA/25491/2017 · 2025-12-04
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180003 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 180003 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 25491 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 4, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shishir Jain, Ram Ratan, Sweety Pandey (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Indresh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. Thru M.D. Lucknow .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench