Contempt Petition No.186 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Contempt Petition No.186 of 2012 1. A.P.Sekar 2. C.Athan 3. M.Vijayakumar 4. P.M.Sundaramurthy 5. G.Alagarsamy 6. T.Karruppasamy 7. Veeranam 8. C.Alagarsamy 9. C.Sekar 10. V.Poompandi 11. Thirumalaimannan 12. K.Velmurugan ... Petitioners Vs. 1. Mr.S.Bhakthavatsalam, Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2. Mr.K.Thangaraj, Superintending Engineer, Madurai Electricity Distribution, Circle, K.Pudhur, Madurai 3. P.Padmavathy ... Respondents [R-3 suo motu impleaded vide order dated 11.11.2024] p. 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.186 of 2012 Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act for the non-compliance of the order dated 20.01.2011 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.12762 of 2009. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Prakash, Senior Counsel For Respondents : Mr.Ananda Gopalan O R D E R The respondent/ contemnor filed an additional affidavit dated 03.01.2025, stating that the petitioners were granted permanency from different dates, as indicated in Paragraph No.1 of the additional affidavit. It is also further brought to the notice of this court that the respondents are ready to disburse the amounts as detailed in the annexures appended to the additional affidavit and thus, reported that the respondents are ready to comply with the order dated 20.01.2011 passed in W.P.No.12762 of 2009. 2. Mr.V.Prakash, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners, however, contended that though the petitioners were granted permanency from different dates, but consequential benefits have not been extended, and he is not sure about the amounts that are due and payable to the petitioner. Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.186 of 2012 However, he submitted that the petitioners would receive the amounts as is mentioned in the annexures appended to the additional affidavit under protest and in case, if any further differential amounts are due, the petitioners may be granted liberty to make a claim under 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, including the consequential promotion, seniority etc., 3. While granting liberty as sought for, the contempt petition is closed. The respondents are directed to release the amounts, as agreed, within a period of two weeks from today. No costs. 02.07.2025 skr Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No p. 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.186 of 2012 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J. skr Contempt Petition No.186 of 2012 p. 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Contempt Petition No.186 of 2012 02.07.2025 p. 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis