MAHENDER PARTAP SINGH RANA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPSB/476/2014 · 2025-07-23
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1800 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1800 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:6468-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSB No.476 of 2014 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
Mr. G.D. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State.
3. Ms. Menka Tripathi, learned counsel for appearing for respondent no.2.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioner makes a statement at Bar that writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
5. In view of the above statement made by
learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.07.2025 SS