HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6374 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Umesh Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shishir Kumar Saxena, Advocate who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no.2 and filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. The petitioner has made final prayer for staying order dated 07.03.2025, passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow in Securitization Application No.16 of 2025 without seeking quashing thereof. Further, the petitioner has got a statutory remedy of filing an appeal before D.R.A.T. 3. In view of these facts, this court is not inclined to entertain this petition, which is dismissed accordingly leaving it open for the petitioner to avail statutory remedy of filing an appeal against the order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal. November 3, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Sushil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Debts Recovery Tribunal Lko. Thru. Registrar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench