HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1609 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.116 of 2025 under sections 319(2), 316(2), 336(3), 318(3), 338 of BNS, P.S. Nawabganj, district Gonda. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused Tilakram has been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order, Annexure-5. He claims parity. 4. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. He submits that in the statement of the complainant, there is no averment that Tilakram has received any amount in his account. On this ground, anticipatory bail was granted to the said co- accused. It is further submitted that the role of the accused applicant is distinct. He as well as the co-accused Anil Yadav and Sunil Yadav have received Rs.2.50 lacs in cash. Rs.2.50 lacs has also been given through RTGS in the account of Keshav Ram. Out of that, Rs.2 lacs has been refunded by Keshav Ram through RTGS on 17.4.2025. The remaining amount has not been returned. Therefore, a Crl. Misc. W.P. No.5942 of 2025 filed by Anil Yadav and another has been dismissed vide order dated Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Nishad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anil Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 21.7.2025.(Annexure-7) 5.Considering the above aspects of the matter, perusal of the record, statement of the complainant and the order passed by the Division Bench of this court in the aforesaid petition, this court finds that the role assigned to the accused applicant is distinct from the co-accused Tilakram. Prima facie, it does not appear to be a case of false implication. Anticipatory bail is an exceptional jurisdiction. No case for anticipatory bail is made out. 6.The application is accordingly dismissed. October 29, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1609 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench