APHC010249002018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 11884 of 2018 Between: 1. R SANTHI KUMAR,, S/O LATE SRI R. ADINARAYANA, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC- SR. ASSISTANT IN TTD, TIRUPATI, R/O D.NO.9-19/ 11, VIJAY NAGAR COLONY, NEW PET, CHANDRAGIRI - 517 510, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. CHITTOOR ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS.III) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT GUNTUR 2. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM (TTD), TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER ELECTRICALII, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM (TTD), TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the entire records pertaining the Impugned Order in G.O.Rt.No.815 dated 08.08.2017, confirming the Order of the Appellate Authority dated 07.12.2016 and the Order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 03.06.2015 by declaring the same as is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, against the Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the Impugned Order in G.O.Rt.No.815 dated 08.08.2017, the Appellate Authority Order dated 07.12.2016 and the Disciplinary Authority Order dated 03.06.2015 by directing the respondents to reinstate the applicant into service with all consequential benefits and 2 pass further orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. V R N PRASHANTH The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the entire records pertaining the Impugned Order in G.O.Rt.No.815 dated 08.08.2017 confirming the Order of the Appellate Authority dated 07.12.2016 and the Order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 03.06.2015 by declaring the same as is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, against the Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the Impugned Order in G.O.Rt.No.815 dated 08.08.2017 the Appellate Authority Order dated 07.12.2016 and the Disciplinary Authority Order dated 03.06.2015 by directing the respondents to reinstate the applicant into service with all consequential benefits and pass.....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for respondents is in attendance. 3 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 11884 of 2018 25.06.2025 Mjl /*