Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179902 (ALL)

BHOLA @ RAJAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/11834/2025 · 2025-12-05

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW . CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11834 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.466 of 2024, under Section 65(1) BNS, P.S. Maharajganj, District Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was granted bail vide order dated 16.10.2025. Subsequently, Section 65(1) of BNS was added and the present application is in the newly added section. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering and adopting the reasoning of the earlier bail order dated 16.10.2025, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail in the added Section 65(1) BNS also. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Bhola @ Rajan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number under Section 65(1) BNS on the same terms and conditions as Versus . Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Pratap Singh . Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bhola @ Rajan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) contained in the order dated 16.10.2025. 7. The applicant need not to submit fresh bail bond and sureties and the same deposited in terms to the order dated 16.10.2025 shall remain valid for this order also. December 5, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 11834 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench